วันศุกร์ที่ 10 กรกฎาคม พ.ศ. 2552

[] Instead of Alistrol?

has posted a new item, 'Instead of Alistrol?'

Two other possible choices: scary pharmaceuticals, and ineffective
nutritionals. What motivates a person with high blood pressure to search for a
blood pressure-lowering product ? preferably a natural, organic nutritional
supplement ? instead of relying on one of the three major conventional
pharmaceutical approaches to mitigating hypertension?Most conventional
pharmaceuticals are only intended as temporary 'bandages,' and do not address
the underlying physiological problems nor purport to offer a long-term solution.
They control a person's high blood pressure only as long as they are being
taken faithfully on a regular basis. Then, of course, there are certain
reported side effects.All categories of prescription blood-pressure drugs ?
alpha blocker, diuretic, or vasodilator ? have their dark sides, affecting at
least a few people, ranging from impotence and numbness to dizziness and
irregular heartbeat.As for nutritionals ? you can start visiting health-food
stores, and engaging the people in charge of them in seemingly enlightening
conversations. Begin by trying each store?s 'most highly recommended'
formula, one at a time, searching for a formula that won't let you down. Your
experience is likely to be that none of them can even make a serious dent in
your high-blood-pressure numbers.A common theme runs through virtually all of
these supplement formulas. They pretty much all have similar lists of
ingredients: magnesium, potassium, calcium, vitamin C, cayenne, and garlic. So
it stands to reason that, if one of them doesn?t work for you, it is likely that
none of them will. Discouraging . . .But, remember that Alistrol includes some
different ingredients.The Author Alistrol, the #1 natural supplement proven to
regulate your blood pressure and provide the best in heart health maintenance.
High Blood Pressure Medicines =>http://www.alistrol.com - Research has shown
that fertilizers, pesticides and hormone supplements have successfully entered
the food chain have become common place in our food and drink. Consequently,
this has had a knock on effect on the environment and our health with concern
increasing more and more. Expensive labels? Organic food costs more simply
because it costs more money and time to prepare. For example certain types of
apples can be sprayed up to 16 times with 36 different pesticides and 350
chemicals are regularly used in conventional farming. Only four are permitted in
organic farming. Even though this might be the case careful inspection into the
food labelled 'organic' can open up another can of worms. There are a few
classes of organic product on the shelves which break down as follows: Made with
organic ingredients - Only 70% of the ingredients must be organic Organic - At
least 95 percent of ingredients are produced organically 100% organic - No
synthetic ingredients are allowed by law The price naturally increments skywards
depending on how 'organic' the produce really is and adds those unwanted pennies
to your bill. At the same time it gives an insight into companies who use a
minimum of organic ingredients to attain the label. Many are turning to farmers
markets springing up all over the UK, where on a Saturday or Sunday afternoon
you can buy 100% organic fruit and vegetables without worrying about the
ulterior motives of the big 3. Organic purists prefer a little soil on their
carrots than the clinically prepared plastic packaged semi-organic alternatives
in the supermarket. There are many online companies like Abel & Cole who will
take your order over the internet or over the phone and deliver it straight to
your door (soil included). The organic industry came under criticism by the
former head of the government's food watchdog. "My advice would be not to worry
about the organic, but worry about your kids having more vegetables," said Sir
John Krebs, head of the Food Standards Agency until April 2005. He had also said
that there was no scientific evidence to prove that organic food was healthier.
Lord Melchett, policy director for the Soil Association retorted saying "[He]
turns round and says, 'well it would be much better to eat three portions of
spinach a week than switch to organic' - this is, I think, an intellectually
flawed argument," You get what you pay for. As with anything there is a trade
off between how much you're willing to pay for something and what you'll get out
of it; this I think we are all happy to accept. The issue here seems to be the
size of this industry and the relative ignorance surrounding it, leaving the
public to do their own research into what they're buying to make sure they're
money is well spent.About the Author Julian Hall of
http://www.Got-Organic.co.uk, Organic Products, Organic Food Marketing, Organic
Information

You may view the latest post at
http://www.richproject.co.cc/?p=2128

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.
Best regards,
admin
k_malee@hotmail.com

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น